<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

   <channel>
       <title>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020 - British Herpetological Society</title>
       <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
       <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020?format=html</link>
              
              <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
       <atom:link href="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020?format=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
       <language>en-GB</language>
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>

              <item>
           <title>07a. Supplementary Materials for pp.47-51</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2032-07a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-47-51?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2032-07a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-47-51/file" length="1272446" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2032-07a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-47-51/file"
                fileSize="1272446"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">07a. Supplementary Materials for pp.47-51</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Giovanni Amori et al.</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2032-07a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-47-51?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Giovanni Amori et al.</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>06a. Supplementary Materials for pp. 35-46</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2031-06a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-35-46?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2031-06a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-35-46/file" length="1178875" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2031-06a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-35-46/file"
                fileSize="1178875"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">06a. Supplementary Materials for pp. 35-46</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Hugo Cabral et al.</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2031-06a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-35-46?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Hugo Cabral et al.</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>05a. Supplementary Materials for pp.27-34</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2030-05a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-27-34?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2030-05a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-27-34/file" length="1296179" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2030-05a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-27-34/file"
                fileSize="1296179"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">05a. Supplementary Materials for pp.27-34</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Alessandro Ribeiro Morais et al.</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2030-05a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-27-34?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Alessandro Ribeiro Morais et al.</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>02a. Supplementary Materials for pp.2-12</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2029-02a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-2-12?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2029-02a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-2-12/file" length="2017626" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2029-02a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-2-12/file"
                fileSize="2017626"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">02a. Supplementary Materials for pp.2-12</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors:</strong> Naeimeh Eskandarzadeh et al.</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2029-02a-supplementary-materials-for-pp-2-12?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors:</strong> Naeimeh Eskandarzadeh et al.</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020 - Full Issue</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2028-volume-30-number-1-january-2020-full-issue?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2028-volume-30-number-1-january-2020-full-issue/file" length="6924664" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2028-volume-30-number-1-january-2020-full-issue/file"
                fileSize="6924664"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020 - Full Issue</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2028-volume-30-number-1-january-2020-full-issue?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>07. A review of mono- and bispecific genera of Amphibians worldwide</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2027-07-a-review-of-mono-and-bispecific-genera-of-amphibians-worldwide?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2027-07-a-review-of-mono-and-bispecific-genera-of-amphibians-worldwide/file" length="2078998" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2027-07-a-review-of-mono-and-bispecific-genera-of-amphibians-worldwide/file"
                fileSize="2078998"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">07. A review of mono- and bispecific genera of Amphibians worldwide</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.4751">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.4751</a></p>
<p>pp. 47-51</p>
<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Giovanni Amori, Marco A. Bologna &amp; Luca Luiselli</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: Monospecific and bispecific genera are of particular interest in studies of taxonomic diversity and speciation evolution. Here, the distribution patterns of mono- and bispecific amphibians worldwide are investigated, with some discussion of on the conservation implications also presented. Based on an online database search (available from the American Museum of Natural History, New York), we found that the mean number of mono- and bispecific genera was similar among zoogeographic regions, with a total of 120 mono- (95 Anura, 17 Caudata, 8 Gymnophiona) and 65 bispecific (48 Anura, 10 Caudata, 7 Gymnophiona) genera. Out of 73 known amphibian families worldwide, only 35.6 % of them do not contain any mono- or bispecific genera. The frequency of mono- or bispecific genera by family was not significantly different among Anura, Caudata and Gymnophiona. There was a general tendency for the number of mono- and bispecific genera of amphibians to be positively correlated with the total number of genera in that family. In Anura, there was a preponderance of mono-specific genera in Afrotropical and Neotropical regions. Concerning bispecific genera, there was a clear preponderance in the Neotropical region for anurans. There was a positive correlation between the number of threatened genera (according to the IUCN Red List) in both the mono- and bispecific groups and the relative number of species in each taxon, thus showing that taxonomical speciosity clearly influences the frequency of occurrence of mono- and bispecific taxa in each family and order. In this<br />regard, Anura dominated in both the number of worldwide described mono- and bispecific taxa as well as in that of the threatened ones according to IUCN Red List.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Anura, Caudata, Gymnophiona, monospecific genera, bispecific genera, biogeography, conservation</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2027-07-a-review-of-mono-and-bispecific-genera-of-amphibians-worldwide?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.4751">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.4751</a></p>
<p>pp. 47-51</p>
<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Giovanni Amori, Marco A. Bologna &amp; Luca Luiselli</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: Monospecific and bispecific genera are of particular interest in studies of taxonomic diversity and speciation evolution. Here, the distribution patterns of mono- and bispecific amphibians worldwide are investigated, with some discussion of on the conservation implications also presented. Based on an online database search (available from the American Museum of Natural History, New York), we found that the mean number of mono- and bispecific genera was similar among zoogeographic regions, with a total of 120 mono- (95 Anura, 17 Caudata, 8 Gymnophiona) and 65 bispecific (48 Anura, 10 Caudata, 7 Gymnophiona) genera. Out of 73 known amphibian families worldwide, only 35.6 % of them do not contain any mono- or bispecific genera. The frequency of mono- or bispecific genera by family was not significantly different among Anura, Caudata and Gymnophiona. There was a general tendency for the number of mono- and bispecific genera of amphibians to be positively correlated with the total number of genera in that family. In Anura, there was a preponderance of mono-specific genera in Afrotropical and Neotropical regions. Concerning bispecific genera, there was a clear preponderance in the Neotropical region for anurans. There was a positive correlation between the number of threatened genera (according to the IUCN Red List) in both the mono- and bispecific groups and the relative number of species in each taxon, thus showing that taxonomical speciosity clearly influences the frequency of occurrence of mono- and bispecific taxa in each family and order. In this<br />regard, Anura dominated in both the number of worldwide described mono- and bispecific taxa as well as in that of the threatened ones according to IUCN Red List.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Anura, Caudata, Gymnophiona, monospecific genera, bispecific genera, biogeography, conservation</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>06. Multiscale endemism analysis for amphibians of Paraguay</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2026-06-multiscale-endemism-analysis-for-amphibians-of-paraguay?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2026-06-multiscale-endemism-analysis-for-amphibians-of-paraguay/file" length="2780827" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2026-06-multiscale-endemism-analysis-for-amphibians-of-paraguay/file"
                fileSize="2780827"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">06. Multiscale endemism analysis for amphibians of Paraguay</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.3546">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.3546</a></p>
<p>pp. 35-46</p>
<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Hugo Cabral, M. Dolores Casagranda, Francisco Brusquetti, Flavia Netto, Vanda Ferreira &amp; Esteban Lavilla</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: Although there are many studies that analyse and describe the distribution patterns of diverse organisms in South America at different scales, Paraguay has been poorly assessed from a biogeographic point of view. Some of the available contributions on the biogeography of Paraguay are based on different taxonomic groups, such as mammals, birds, reptiles, and plants, describing relationships between species and their habitats by using indices of similarity and cluster analysis. The main objective of this contribution is to identify areas of endemism based on the distribution of the 87 amphibian species known from Paraguay, and to compare the results with the three schemes of ecoregion proposed for the country. Eight areas of endemism were identified at different size of grids/scales, congruent with Dry Chaco, Atlantic Forest, Cerrado, Grasslands of Mesopotamia, Ñeembucú, and the Great American Chaco ecoregions.</p>
<p>Keywords: Anura, Areas of Endemism, Biogeography, Distribution data, NDM/VNDM, South America</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2026-06-multiscale-endemism-analysis-for-amphibians-of-paraguay?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.3546">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.3546</a></p>
<p>pp. 35-46</p>
<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Hugo Cabral, M. Dolores Casagranda, Francisco Brusquetti, Flavia Netto, Vanda Ferreira &amp; Esteban Lavilla</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: Although there are many studies that analyse and describe the distribution patterns of diverse organisms in South America at different scales, Paraguay has been poorly assessed from a biogeographic point of view. Some of the available contributions on the biogeography of Paraguay are based on different taxonomic groups, such as mammals, birds, reptiles, and plants, describing relationships between species and their habitats by using indices of similarity and cluster analysis. The main objective of this contribution is to identify areas of endemism based on the distribution of the 87 amphibian species known from Paraguay, and to compare the results with the three schemes of ecoregion proposed for the country. Eight areas of endemism were identified at different size of grids/scales, congruent with Dry Chaco, Atlantic Forest, Cerrado, Grasslands of Mesopotamia, Ñeembucú, and the Great American Chaco ecoregions.</p>
<p>Keywords: Anura, Areas of Endemism, Biogeography, Distribution data, NDM/VNDM, South America</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>05. Anuran species in Brazil's protected areas network</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2025-05-anuran-species-in-brazil-s-protected-areas-network?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2025-05-anuran-species-in-brazil-s-protected-areas-network/file" length="2272143" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2025-05-anuran-species-in-brazil-s-protected-areas-network/file"
                fileSize="2272143"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">05. Anuran species in Brazil's protected areas network</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.2734">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.2734</a></p>
<p>pp. 27-34</p>
<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Alessandro Ribeiro Morais, Tainã Lucas Andreani, Rhayane Alves, Carolina Emília dos Santos, Jhonatan Barros, Wadson Rodrigues Rezende &amp; Priscila Lemes</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: Amphibians are one of the most threatened among the vertebrates species and urgently require conservation protection and planning. The establishment of protected areas (PAs) is one of the most important strategies in protecting biodiversity, as they offer a partial solution to habitat modification. Our main objective was to analyse the temporal and spatial trends in the anuran species inventories of PAs in Brazil, therefore providing an extensive list of anuran species in the Brazilian PAs network for the first time. We considered a combination of keywords while using the data on “Scopus”, “Scielo”, and “Web of Science”. We found 115 papers that published anuran species lists for 101 Brazilian protected areas. Overall, we registered 605 species distributed in 20 families. Only seven out of the 605 anuran species registered in the present study are threatened by extinction and 40 are listed as Data Deficient. The number of anuran species inventories in Brazilian protected areas has increased over time (r = 0.17; r<sup>2</sup> = 0.267; p&lt;0.01), with its peak in 2011 (n = 15 inventories). The majority of the species inventories were conducted in protected areas located in the Atlantic Forest (55.45 %). The number of anuran species per protected area varied from seven to 80; however, we did not find any relationship between the species richness and size of the protected areas (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.027; r = 0.165; p = 0.092). Our results can be useful to fill the gaps and integrate knowledge; and this reinforces the importance of the present study in contributing to the knowledge and conservation of anuran species in Brazil.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Brazilian biomes, species list, inventory, temporal and spatial trends</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2025-05-anuran-species-in-brazil-s-protected-areas-network?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.2734">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.2734</a></p>
<p>pp. 27-34</p>
<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Alessandro Ribeiro Morais, Tainã Lucas Andreani, Rhayane Alves, Carolina Emília dos Santos, Jhonatan Barros, Wadson Rodrigues Rezende &amp; Priscila Lemes</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: Amphibians are one of the most threatened among the vertebrates species and urgently require conservation protection and planning. The establishment of protected areas (PAs) is one of the most important strategies in protecting biodiversity, as they offer a partial solution to habitat modification. Our main objective was to analyse the temporal and spatial trends in the anuran species inventories of PAs in Brazil, therefore providing an extensive list of anuran species in the Brazilian PAs network for the first time. We considered a combination of keywords while using the data on “Scopus”, “Scielo”, and “Web of Science”. We found 115 papers that published anuran species lists for 101 Brazilian protected areas. Overall, we registered 605 species distributed in 20 families. Only seven out of the 605 anuran species registered in the present study are threatened by extinction and 40 are listed as Data Deficient. The number of anuran species inventories in Brazilian protected areas has increased over time (r = 0.17; r<sup>2</sup> = 0.267; p&lt;0.01), with its peak in 2011 (n = 15 inventories). The majority of the species inventories were conducted in protected areas located in the Atlantic Forest (55.45 %). The number of anuran species per protected area varied from seven to 80; however, we did not find any relationship between the species richness and size of the protected areas (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.027; r = 0.165; p = 0.092). Our results can be useful to fill the gaps and integrate knowledge; and this reinforces the importance of the present study in contributing to the knowledge and conservation of anuran species in Brazil.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Brazilian biomes, species list, inventory, temporal and spatial trends</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>04. Temporal trends in [i]Podarcis muralis[/i] and [i]Lacerta bilineata[/i] populations in a fragmented landscape in western France: Results from a 14 year time series</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2024-04-temporal-trends-in-i-podarcis-muralis-i-and-i-lacerta-bilineata-i-populations-in-a-fragmented-landscape-in-western-france-results-from-a-14-year-time-series?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2024-04-temporal-trends-in-i-podarcis-muralis-i-and-i-lacerta-bilineata-i-populations-in-a-fragmented-landscape-in-western-france-results-from-a-14-year-time-series/file" length="2348218" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2024-04-temporal-trends-in-i-podarcis-muralis-i-and-i-lacerta-bilineata-i-populations-in-a-fragmented-landscape-in-western-france-results-from-a-14-year-time-series/file"
                fileSize="2348218"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">04. Temporal trends in [i]Podarcis muralis[/i] and [i]Lacerta bilineata[/i] populations in a fragmented landscape in western France: Results from a 14 year time series</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.2026">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.2026</a></p>
<p>pp. 20-26</p>
<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Roger Meek</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: Identifying population changes is a prerequisite for any conservation efforts, but to evaluate trends requires long-term data sets. In this paper, changes in population numbers in two species of European lizards, <em>Lacerta bilineata</em> and <em>Podarcis muralis</em>, are described. The results are based on counts of mortalities and live lizard presence on roads collected over a 14 year period, which indicated wide annual fluctuations in numbers in both species, with inter-specific annual trends<br />strongly correlated. Snout to vent lengths (SVL) in <em>L. bilineata</em> were generally longer when annual numbers were higher but not in <em>P. muralis</em>. Regression analysis of the logarithmic transforms of annual lizard numbers as dependent variables and year as the independent variable indicated that despite population fluctuations, numbers of both species were stable or increased during the period of observation. Jackknife analysis identified unusually high numbers of <em>L. bilineata</em> in 2012 and <em>P. muralis</em> in 2010, but data from these years had minimal influence on the general trends with the peudo-regression coefficients generated from the Jackknife analysis in agreement with the true regressions. The results were therefore congruent, indicating annual fluctuations in both species were underpinned by long-term population stability.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: lizards, <em>Lacerta bilineata</em>, <em>Podarcis muralis</em>, population changes, road ecology</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2024-04-temporal-trends-in-i-podarcis-muralis-i-and-i-lacerta-bilineata-i-populations-in-a-fragmented-landscape-in-western-france-results-from-a-14-year-time-series?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.2026">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.2026</a></p>
<p>pp. 20-26</p>
<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Roger Meek</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: Identifying population changes is a prerequisite for any conservation efforts, but to evaluate trends requires long-term data sets. In this paper, changes in population numbers in two species of European lizards, <em>Lacerta bilineata</em> and <em>Podarcis muralis</em>, are described. The results are based on counts of mortalities and live lizard presence on roads collected over a 14 year period, which indicated wide annual fluctuations in numbers in both species, with inter-specific annual trends<br />strongly correlated. Snout to vent lengths (SVL) in <em>L. bilineata</em> were generally longer when annual numbers were higher but not in <em>P. muralis</em>. Regression analysis of the logarithmic transforms of annual lizard numbers as dependent variables and year as the independent variable indicated that despite population fluctuations, numbers of both species were stable or increased during the period of observation. Jackknife analysis identified unusually high numbers of <em>L. bilineata</em> in 2012 and <em>P. muralis</em> in 2010, but data from these years had minimal influence on the general trends with the peudo-regression coefficients generated from the Jackknife analysis in agreement with the true regressions. The results were therefore congruent, indicating annual fluctuations in both species were underpinned by long-term population stability.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: lizards, <em>Lacerta bilineata</em>, <em>Podarcis muralis</em>, population changes, road ecology</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>03. How does captivity affect skin colour reflectance of golden mantella frogs?</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2023-03-how-does-captivity-affect-skin-colour-reflectance-of-golden-mantella-frogs?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2023-03-how-does-captivity-affect-skin-colour-reflectance-of-golden-mantella-frogs/file" length="2221489" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2023-03-how-does-captivity-affect-skin-colour-reflectance-of-golden-mantella-frogs/file"
                fileSize="2221489"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">03. How does captivity affect skin colour reflectance of golden mantella frogs?</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.1319">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.1319</a></p>
<p>pp. 13-19</p>
<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Luiza F Passos, Gerardo Garcia &amp; Robert Young</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong>:&nbsp; Coloration is an important trait for social communication in amphibians, being used in intra- and intersexual signalling to express information about individual body condition and health state, amongst other things. The striking colour pattern exhibited by some anuran species are also used in “aposematic” signals to advertise unpalatability to predators. The aim of this study was to investigate how the captive environment affects the colour of golden mantella frogs by comparing captive reared frogs with wild conspecifics. A USB-2000 portable diode-array spectrometer and a xenon strobe light source were used to perform spectrophotometric measurements on captive and wild populations. Hue, chroma and brightness of skin colour were analysed as well as body condition using the scaled mass index. Analyses showed variation among populations, but significant differences were only found between captive and wild populations. Generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effects of body condition on colour variation and showed that animals with lower body condition from one captive population had significantly different coloration than their wild counterparts. Importantly, one captive population was not greatly different in coloration from their wild counterparts – demonstrating that this problem is not inevitable in captivity. These results can have important implications for reintroduction programmes.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: amphibians, body condition, coloration, conservation</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2023-03-how-does-captivity-affect-skin-colour-reflectance-of-golden-mantella-frogs?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.1319">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.1319</a></p>
<p>pp. 13-19</p>
<p><strong>Authors</strong>: Luiza F Passos, Gerardo Garcia &amp; Robert Young</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong>:&nbsp; Coloration is an important trait for social communication in amphibians, being used in intra- and intersexual signalling to express information about individual body condition and health state, amongst other things. The striking colour pattern exhibited by some anuran species are also used in “aposematic” signals to advertise unpalatability to predators. The aim of this study was to investigate how the captive environment affects the colour of golden mantella frogs by comparing captive reared frogs with wild conspecifics. A USB-2000 portable diode-array spectrometer and a xenon strobe light source were used to perform spectrophotometric measurements on captive and wild populations. Hue, chroma and brightness of skin colour were analysed as well as body condition using the scaled mass index. Analyses showed variation among populations, but significant differences were only found between captive and wild populations. Generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effects of body condition on colour variation and showed that animals with lower body condition from one captive population had significantly different coloration than their wild counterparts. Importantly, one captive population was not greatly different in coloration from their wild counterparts – demonstrating that this problem is not inevitable in captivity. These results can have important implications for reintroduction programmes.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: amphibians, body condition, coloration, conservation</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>02. Revised classification of the genus [i]Eryx[/i] Daudin, 1803 (Serpentes: Erycidae) in Iran and neighbouring areas, based on mtDNA sequences and morphological data</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2022-02-revised-classification-of-the-genus-i-eryx-i-daudin-1803-serpentes-erycidae-in-iran-and-neighbouring-areas-based-on-mtdna-sequences-and-morphological-data?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2022-02-revised-classification-of-the-genus-i-eryx-i-daudin-1803-serpentes-erycidae-in-iran-and-neighbouring-areas-based-on-mtdna-sequences-and-morphological-data/file" length="3587016" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2022-02-revised-classification-of-the-genus-i-eryx-i-daudin-1803-serpentes-erycidae-in-iran-and-neighbouring-areas-based-on-mtdna-sequences-and-morphological-data/file"
                fileSize="3587016"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">02. Revised classification of the genus [i]Eryx[/i] Daudin, 1803 (Serpentes: Erycidae) in Iran and neighbouring areas, based on mtDNA sequences and morphological data</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.212">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.212</a></p>
<p>pp. 2-12</p>
<p><strong>Authors:</strong> Naeimeh Eskandarzadeh, Nasrullah Rastegar-Pouyani, Eskandar Rastegar-Pouyani, Fatemeh Todehdehghan, Mahdi Rajabizadeh, Mohammad Zarrintab, Fadhil Abbas Rhadi &amp; Haji Gholi Kami</p>
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> Several attempts have recently been made to elucidate taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships among the species and subspecies of sand boas of the genus [i]Eryx[/i] throughout their distribution range, with no stable consensus about their taxonomy. Here the phylogenetic relationships among the populations of [i]Eryx[/i] in Iran and adjacent areas are studied based on two mitochondrial markers (cyt<em>b</em> and 16S). Sixteen morphological characters were examined for evaluation of morphological differences among major populations. Ecological niche modeling was applied to demonstrate the potential distribution of the populations in Iran. ENMtools was also used to measure the degree of niche overlap among the major populations in Iran. Based on phylogenetic reconstruction and considering the genetic distances with specimens from type localities, <em>E. tataricus</em> is a junior synonym of <em>E. miliaris</em> and the subspecies rank for <em>E. m. nogaiorum</em> seems to be invalid. Considering the genetic distance of populations in western Iran and Iraq, and the habitat and morphological differences among the populations of<em> Eryx</em> in western Iran, Iraq and Egypt, the population of <em>Eryx</em> in western Iran is suggested as a different species from <em>E. jaculus</em>, named here as <em>Eryx</em> sp. and the ones from Iraq as <em>Eryx</em> cf. <em>jaculus</em>. Here, the evaluation and revision of taxonomic status, distribution ranges and descriptions of morphological characters of the studied species have been done.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: <em>Eryx</em>, taxonomy, phylogeny, mitochondrial markers, morphology, niche modeling, niche overlap</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2022-02-revised-classification-of-the-genus-i-eryx-i-daudin-1803-serpentes-erycidae-in-iran-and-neighbouring-areas-based-on-mtdna-sequences-and-morphological-data?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.212">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.212</a></p>
<p>pp. 2-12</p>
<p><strong>Authors:</strong> Naeimeh Eskandarzadeh, Nasrullah Rastegar-Pouyani, Eskandar Rastegar-Pouyani, Fatemeh Todehdehghan, Mahdi Rajabizadeh, Mohammad Zarrintab, Fadhil Abbas Rhadi &amp; Haji Gholi Kami</p>
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> Several attempts have recently been made to elucidate taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships among the species and subspecies of sand boas of the genus [i]Eryx[/i] throughout their distribution range, with no stable consensus about their taxonomy. Here the phylogenetic relationships among the populations of [i]Eryx[/i] in Iran and adjacent areas are studied based on two mitochondrial markers (cyt<em>b</em> and 16S). Sixteen morphological characters were examined for evaluation of morphological differences among major populations. Ecological niche modeling was applied to demonstrate the potential distribution of the populations in Iran. ENMtools was also used to measure the degree of niche overlap among the major populations in Iran. Based on phylogenetic reconstruction and considering the genetic distances with specimens from type localities, <em>E. tataricus</em> is a junior synonym of <em>E. miliaris</em> and the subspecies rank for <em>E. m. nogaiorum</em> seems to be invalid. Considering the genetic distance of populations in western Iran and Iraq, and the habitat and morphological differences among the populations of<em> Eryx</em> in western Iran, Iraq and Egypt, the population of <em>Eryx</em> in western Iran is suggested as a different species from <em>E. jaculus</em>, named here as <em>Eryx</em> sp. and the ones from Iraq as <em>Eryx</em> cf. <em>jaculus</em>. Here, the evaluation and revision of taxonomic status, distribution ranges and descriptions of morphological characters of the studied species have been done.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: <em>Eryx</em>, taxonomy, phylogeny, mitochondrial markers, morphology, niche modeling, niche overlap</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>01. Herpetological Journal 2020 and beyond – Issue 30(1)</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2021-01-herpetological-journal-2020-and-beyond-issue-30-1?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2021-01-herpetological-journal-2020-and-beyond-issue-30-1/file" length="1764321" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2021-01-herpetological-journal-2020-and-beyond-issue-30-1/file"
                fileSize="1764321"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">01. Herpetological Journal 2020 and beyond – Issue 30(1)</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.1</a></p>
<p>pp. 1</p>
<p>Simon Maddock</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-30-number-1-january-2020/2021-01-herpetological-journal-2020-and-beyond-issue-30-1?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1">https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.1</a></p>
<p>pp. 1</p>
<p>Simon Maddock</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@sarahberryonline.com (Sarah Berry)</author>
           <category>Volume 30, Number 1, January 2020</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
          </channel>
</rss>