<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

   <channel>
       <title>Volume 32, Number 4, October 2022 - British Herpetological Society</title>
       <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
       <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022?format=html</link>
              
              <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:21:51 +0100</lastBuildDate>
       <atom:link href="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022?format=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
       <language>en-GB</language>
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>

              <item>
           <title>Volume 32, Number 4, October 2022</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3701-volume-32-number-4-october-2022?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3701-volume-32-number-4-october-2022/file" length="3420074" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3701-volume-32-number-4-october-2022/file"
                fileSize="3420074"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">Volume 32, Number 4, October 2022</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3701-volume-32-number-4-october-2022?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
           <author>managingeditor2@thebhs.org (Julie Tee)</author>
           <category>Volume 32, Number 4, October 2022</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:21:51 +0100</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>03.Diet composition and tropic niche overlap of [i]Ameivula ocellifera[/i] Spix 1825 (Squamata: Teiidae) and [i]Tropidurus cocorobensis[/i] Rodrigues 1987 (Squamata: Tropiduridae), sympatric species with different foraging modes, in Caatinga</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3700-03-diet-composition-and-tropic-niche-overlap-of-i-ameivula-ocellifera-i-spix-1825-squamata-teiidae-and-i-tropidurus-cocorobensis-i-rodrigues-1987-squamata-tropiduridae-sympatric-species-with-different-foraging-modes-in-caatinga?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3700-03-diet-composition-and-tropic-niche-overlap-of-i-ameivula-ocellifera-i-spix-1825-squamata-teiidae-and-i-tropidurus-cocorobensis-i-rodrigues-1987-squamata-tropiduridae-sympatric-species-with-different-foraging-modes-in-caatinga/file" length="847204" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3700-03-diet-composition-and-tropic-niche-overlap-of-i-ameivula-ocellifera-i-spix-1825-squamata-teiidae-and-i-tropidurus-cocorobensis-i-rodrigues-1987-squamata-tropiduridae-sympatric-species-with-different-foraging-modes-in-caatinga/file"
                fileSize="847204"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">03.Diet composition and tropic niche overlap of [i]Ameivula ocellifera[/i] Spix 1825 (Squamata: Teiidae) and [i]Tropidurus cocorobensis[/i] Rodrigues 1987 (Squamata: Tropiduridae), sympatric species with different foraging modes, in Caatinga</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p>DOI:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.190197" target="_self">https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.190197</a></p>
<p>pp. 190-197</p>
<p><strong>Authors:</strong>&nbsp;Patricia Marques do A. Oliveira, Carlos A. Navas and Pedro M. Sales Nunes</p>
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong>&nbsp;Lizard diets can be influenced by several factors, such as age, physiological aspects, food availability, behaviour and foraging mode. The latter can be an important predictor of the type of prey consumed. This study analysed [i]Ameivula ocellifera[/i] and [i]Tropidurus cocorobensis[/i] diets, both of which are psammophiles and coexist in an area of Caatinga in north-eastern Brazil, but use different foraging modes. Lizard stomachs were examined, and prey categories were quantified by frequency of occurrence, number, volume and relative importance index. We used PERMANOVA and SIMPER analyses to understand the dissimilarities among diets. Additionally, we estimated the degree of trophic niche overlap between species using the Pianka index. The most frequently consumed food item by [i]A. ocellifera[/i] was Isoptera and Formicidae (Hymenoptera) for [i]T. cocorobensis[/i]. The trophic niche overlap between the species was approximately 0.24 and, although there were many consumed prey categories in common, the proportion at which these prey categories were consumed was quite divergent. For example, the consumption of plant material, which was present in the diet of both species, was much more important for [i]T. cocorobensis[/i] compared to the active forager [i]A. ocellifera[/i]. Our results indicate that despite sharing the same space and consuming the same prey types, these species have significant differences in their diets. Furthermore, these divergences can be explained by several factors in the environment and even by the evolutionary history of each species, which are included in different families and are not evolutionarily close to each other.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong>&nbsp;diet, niche overlap, foraging mode, plant consumption, competition</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3700-03-diet-composition-and-tropic-niche-overlap-of-i-ameivula-ocellifera-i-spix-1825-squamata-teiidae-and-i-tropidurus-cocorobensis-i-rodrigues-1987-squamata-tropiduridae-sympatric-species-with-different-foraging-modes-in-caatinga?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p>DOI:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.190197" target="_self">https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.190197</a></p>
<p>pp. 190-197</p>
<p><strong>Authors:</strong>&nbsp;Patricia Marques do A. Oliveira, Carlos A. Navas and Pedro M. Sales Nunes</p>
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong>&nbsp;Lizard diets can be influenced by several factors, such as age, physiological aspects, food availability, behaviour and foraging mode. The latter can be an important predictor of the type of prey consumed. This study analysed [i]Ameivula ocellifera[/i] and [i]Tropidurus cocorobensis[/i] diets, both of which are psammophiles and coexist in an area of Caatinga in north-eastern Brazil, but use different foraging modes. Lizard stomachs were examined, and prey categories were quantified by frequency of occurrence, number, volume and relative importance index. We used PERMANOVA and SIMPER analyses to understand the dissimilarities among diets. Additionally, we estimated the degree of trophic niche overlap between species using the Pianka index. The most frequently consumed food item by [i]A. ocellifera[/i] was Isoptera and Formicidae (Hymenoptera) for [i]T. cocorobensis[/i]. The trophic niche overlap between the species was approximately 0.24 and, although there were many consumed prey categories in common, the proportion at which these prey categories were consumed was quite divergent. For example, the consumption of plant material, which was present in the diet of both species, was much more important for [i]T. cocorobensis[/i] compared to the active forager [i]A. ocellifera[/i]. Our results indicate that despite sharing the same space and consuming the same prey types, these species have significant differences in their diets. Furthermore, these divergences can be explained by several factors in the environment and even by the evolutionary history of each species, which are included in different families and are not evolutionarily close to each other.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong>&nbsp;diet, niche overlap, foraging mode, plant consumption, competition</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
           <author>managingeditor2@thebhs.org (Julie Tee)</author>
           <category>Volume 32, Number 4, October 2022</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:21:49 +0100</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>02a.Supplementary materials for 02.Detectability of reptiles in standardised surveys: a test using grass snake [i]Natrix[/i] helvetica models</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3699-02a-supplementary-materials-for-02-detectability-of-reptiles-in-standardised-surveys-a-test-using-grass-snake-i-natrix-i-helvetica-models?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3699-02a-supplementary-materials-for-02-detectability-of-reptiles-in-standardised-surveys-a-test-using-grass-snake-i-natrix-i-helvetica-models/file" length="790797" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3699-02a-supplementary-materials-for-02-detectability-of-reptiles-in-standardised-surveys-a-test-using-grass-snake-i-natrix-i-helvetica-models/file"
                fileSize="790797"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">02a.Supplementary materials for 02.Detectability of reptiles in standardised surveys: a test using grass snake [i]Natrix[/i] helvetica models</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors:</strong>&nbsp;Mikaella M.G. Lock &amp; Richard A. Griffiths</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3699-02a-supplementary-materials-for-02-detectability-of-reptiles-in-standardised-surveys-a-test-using-grass-snake-i-natrix-i-helvetica-models?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors:</strong>&nbsp;Mikaella M.G. Lock &amp; Richard A. Griffiths</p>]]></description>
           <author>managingeditor2@thebhs.org (Julie Tee)</author>
           <category>Volume 32, Number 4, October 2022</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:21:47 +0100</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>02.Detectability of reptiles in standardised surveys: a test using grass snake [i]Natrix[/i] helvetica models</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3698-02-detectability-of-reptiles-in-standardised-surveys-a-test-using-grass-snake-i-natrix-i-helvetica-models?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3698-02-detectability-of-reptiles-in-standardised-surveys-a-test-using-grass-snake-i-natrix-i-helvetica-models/file" length="779915" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3698-02-detectability-of-reptiles-in-standardised-surveys-a-test-using-grass-snake-i-natrix-i-helvetica-models/file"
                fileSize="779915"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">02.Detectability of reptiles in standardised surveys: a test using grass snake [i]Natrix[/i] helvetica models</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p>DOI:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.183189" target="_self">https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.183189</a></p>
<p>pp. 183-189</p>
<p><strong>Authors:</strong>&nbsp;Mikaella M.G. Lock &amp; Richard A. Griffiths</p>
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong>&nbsp;The ability to detect snakes in the field may be influenced by phenotypic and morphological variables attributable to the target species. These variables include body size, colouration, and body posture. To test what effect these variables had on detectability by surveyors, plasticine model grass snakes were distributed along a predetermined transect in reptile habitat. Detections of different types of snake models along the transect were compared between two groups of inexperienced students and those of a single experienced observer. The experienced surveyor detected 72 % of all the snake models, compared to 53 % and 58 % by the inexperienced groups. All groups detected more larger snakes than smaller snakes, and more uncoiled snakes than coiled snakes. The presence of a yellow/black collar did not influence the detection of the snakes. The results demonstrate the observer bias that may be inherent in surveys of snakes due to variation in size and posture of the target animals. Accounting for such biases in the design of reptile surveys and providing appropriate training and experience for volunteers may improve the validity and interpretation of data collected within citizen science programmes.</p>
<p>Keywords:&nbsp;population assessment, imperfect detection, citizen science, survey protocol</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3698-02-detectability-of-reptiles-in-standardised-surveys-a-test-using-grass-snake-i-natrix-i-helvetica-models?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p>DOI:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.183189" target="_self">https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.183189</a></p>
<p>pp. 183-189</p>
<p><strong>Authors:</strong>&nbsp;Mikaella M.G. Lock &amp; Richard A. Griffiths</p>
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong>&nbsp;The ability to detect snakes in the field may be influenced by phenotypic and morphological variables attributable to the target species. These variables include body size, colouration, and body posture. To test what effect these variables had on detectability by surveyors, plasticine model grass snakes were distributed along a predetermined transect in reptile habitat. Detections of different types of snake models along the transect were compared between two groups of inexperienced students and those of a single experienced observer. The experienced surveyor detected 72 % of all the snake models, compared to 53 % and 58 % by the inexperienced groups. All groups detected more larger snakes than smaller snakes, and more uncoiled snakes than coiled snakes. The presence of a yellow/black collar did not influence the detection of the snakes. The results demonstrate the observer bias that may be inherent in surveys of snakes due to variation in size and posture of the target animals. Accounting for such biases in the design of reptile surveys and providing appropriate training and experience for volunteers may improve the validity and interpretation of data collected within citizen science programmes.</p>
<p>Keywords:&nbsp;population assessment, imperfect detection, citizen science, survey protocol</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
           <author>managingeditor2@thebhs.org (Julie Tee)</author>
           <category>Volume 32, Number 4, October 2022</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:21:46 +0100</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>01a.Supplementary materials for 01.Body size comparisons between wild and captive puff adders [i]Bitis arietans[/i]</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3697-01a-supplementary-materials-for-01-body-size-comparisons-between-wild-and-captive-puff-adders-i-bitis-arietans-i?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3697-01a-supplementary-materials-for-01-body-size-comparisons-between-wild-and-captive-puff-adders-i-bitis-arietans-i/file" length="81274" type="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3697-01a-supplementary-materials-for-01-body-size-comparisons-between-wild-and-captive-puff-adders-i-bitis-arietans-i/file"
                fileSize="81274"
                type="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">01a.Supplementary materials for 01.Body size comparisons between wild and captive puff adders [i]Bitis arietans[/i]</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors:</strong>&nbsp;Daniel Kane &amp; Christopher J. Michaels</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3697-01a-supplementary-materials-for-01-body-size-comparisons-between-wild-and-captive-puff-adders-i-bitis-arietans-i?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Authors:</strong>&nbsp;Daniel Kane &amp; Christopher J. Michaels</p>]]></description>
           <author>managingeditor2@thebhs.org (Julie Tee)</author>
           <category>Volume 32, Number 4, October 2022</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:21:44 +0100</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>01.Body size comparisons between wild and captive puff adders [i]Bitis arietans[/i]</title>
           <link>https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3696-01-body-size-comparisons-between-wild-and-captive-puff-adders-i-bitis-arietans-i?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3696-01-body-size-comparisons-between-wild-and-captive-puff-adders-i-bitis-arietans-i/file" length="911093" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3696-01-body-size-comparisons-between-wild-and-captive-puff-adders-i-bitis-arietans-i/file"
                fileSize="911093"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">01.Body size comparisons between wild and captive puff adders [i]Bitis arietans[/i]</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p>DOI:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.176182" target="_self">https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.176182</a></p>
<p>pp.176-182</p>
<p><strong>Authors:</strong>&nbsp;Daniel Kane &amp; Christopher J. Michaels</p>
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong>&nbsp;Captivity can provide a resource-rich environment for snakes which may lead to over-conditioning of individuals. We compared captive and wild populations of [i]Bitis arietans[/i] to see if a difference in scaled mass index (SMI) existed between the samples. Male [i]B. arietans[/i] had significantly higher SMI in captivity than in the wild; there was no difference between wild and captive females. A sex-related difference in SMI between wild male and female [i]B. arietans[/i], evident in the wild, was not found in captivity. These results suggest that the captive management of [i]B.arietans[/i] may require review to prevent over-conditioning of male snakes, and that this may be informed by further comparative research on wild and captive populations of this species.</p>
<p>Keywords:&nbsp;Body condition, captivity, scaled mass index, Viperinae</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-32-number-4-october-2022/3696-01-body-size-comparisons-between-wild-and-captive-puff-adders-i-bitis-arietans-i?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p>DOI:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.176182" target="_self">https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.176182</a></p>
<p>pp.176-182</p>
<p><strong>Authors:</strong>&nbsp;Daniel Kane &amp; Christopher J. Michaels</p>
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong>&nbsp;Captivity can provide a resource-rich environment for snakes which may lead to over-conditioning of individuals. We compared captive and wild populations of [i]Bitis arietans[/i] to see if a difference in scaled mass index (SMI) existed between the samples. Male [i]B. arietans[/i] had significantly higher SMI in captivity than in the wild; there was no difference between wild and captive females. A sex-related difference in SMI between wild male and female [i]B. arietans[/i], evident in the wild, was not found in captivity. These results suggest that the captive management of [i]B.arietans[/i] may require review to prevent over-conditioning of male snakes, and that this may be informed by further comparative research on wild and captive populations of this species.</p>
<p>Keywords:&nbsp;Body condition, captivity, scaled mass index, Viperinae</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
           <author>managingeditor2@thebhs.org (Julie Tee)</author>
           <category>Volume 32, Number 4, October 2022</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:21:42 +0100</pubDate>
       </item>
          </channel>
</rss>